Reclaiming the Narrative

Lillian Droniak is ninety-four years old and has thirteen million followers on TikTok.

Her videos are short, sharp, and unapologetically herself. She posts dating advice, irreverent commentary on aging, and observations about life that would land differently coming from someone half her age. Her DMs are full of messages from younger people who say she makes them less afraid of getting old. They are also full of comments telling her to act her age, dress appropriately, stop embarrassing herself. She posts anyway.

Lillian did not set out to become the grandmother of the internet. She started making videos during the pandemic, when isolation pushed millions of older adults onto platforms they had never used before. What she discovered was an audience hungry for something they were not getting elsewhere: older people who refused to disappear.

Who Controls the Story

#

The default narrative of aging is decline, loss, and disappearance. This story is not neutral. It serves specific interests.

Industries that sell anti-aging products need aging to be a problem they can solve. The global anti-aging market exceeds $60 billion annually, built on the premise that getting older is something to fight rather than experience. Institutions that prefer older people quiet and compliant benefit from narratives that frame assertiveness as denial and visibility as vanity. Younger people who do not want to think about their own mortality find it easier when older people stay out of sight.

The absence is powerful. Older adults are underrepresented in advertising, film, and television. When they appear, they are often frail, confused, or comic relief. Rarely protagonists. Rarely experts. Rarely desirable. Rarely visible at all. The message is clear enough that it does not need to be stated: after a certain age, stories are no longer told by or about or for you.

This absence shapes expectations, resources, and respect. When older people are invisible, their needs become invisible too. When the only images of aging available are images of decline, everyone absorbs those images, including older people themselves. The power to define what aging means is the power to determine what aging becomes.

Visibility as Resistance

#

Something is shifting. Across platforms and domains, older people are refusing the script.

On social media, the phenomenon has a name: granfluencers. Lillian Droniak is not alone. Helen Ruth Elam, known as Baddie Winkle, is ninety-four years old with over three million Instagram followers, famous for neon outfits and the tagline “Stealing your man since 1928.” The Old Gays, four men averaging seventy-five years old, have eleven million TikTok followers with videos featuring everything from dancing in speedos to commentary on pop culture. Joan MacDonald, who started weight training at seventy and now at seventy-eight has nearly two million followers documenting her fitness journey. Barbara Costello, seventy-four, became Brunch with Babs, sharing cooking tips with three million followers.

In fashion, older models are appearing in campaigns that once featured only youth. Agencies like Gray Model Agency represent people over fifty exclusively. Gym Tan, sixty-three, built a following by demonstrating that style has no expiration date. Dorrie Jacobson, eighty-nine, runs Senior Style Bible from Las Vegas, insisting that “age is what you make it.”

In entrepreneurship, late-life business founders are creating rather than retiring. Covered in Series 6, this population is growing, and their visibility challenges the assumption that creativity and ambition belong to the young.

In athletics, older competitors refuse physical decline as destiny. Masters athletes set records in running, swimming, weightlifting, and cycling. Their bodies are not what they were at thirty; that is not the point. The point is that the body continues, capable of things the dominant narrative says it should not be.

In art and creativity, late work is increasingly recognized. Artists producing significant work in their seventies, eighties, and nineties demonstrate that creative power does not expire. Writers, musicians, painters whose careers span decades show that experience can compound rather than diminish.

In political advocacy, older activists are visible on climate, healthcare, and economic justice. Their presence in public life challenges the assumption that older people should step aside and let the young lead.

Beyond Inspiration Porn

#

The risk with stories of exceptional older people is familiar. Exceptional individuals become superstars of aging, and their stories imply that anyone who does not thrive is failing.

This is the trap of inspiration porn: feel-good narratives that individualize structural problems, ignore health disparities, and substitute exceptional stories for systemic change. The ninety-year-old marathon runner is inspiring; she is also rare. Most older people will not run marathons. The question is whether visibility for the exceptional changes anything for the ordinary.

The distinction matters. Visibility that challenges systems asks why most older people lack the resources, support, and opportunities to thrive. Visibility that lets systems off the hook suggests that thriving is available to anyone with the right attitude, and those who struggle have only themselves to blame.

What matters is whether visibility changes expectations, policies, and opportunities for ordinary older people, not just the exceptional. One influencer with a million followers does not fix ageism. But when the cultural conversation includes more voices refusing the narrative of decline, the conversation itself begins to shift.

Research suggests it is shifting. A study of older TikTok creators found that many use their platforms to confront ageism directly, initiating conversations that complement traditional interventions like educational campaigns. Seventy-eight percent of Generation Z and Millennials surveyed said they gain valuable knowledge from content created by older adults. The platforms that were supposed to be youth-only spaces are becoming intergenerational.

Redefining What Old Age Means

#

The gerontological concept of “successful aging” has been critiqued for implying that aging with disability or illness is failure. If success means maintaining the capacities of middle age indefinitely, most older people will fail by definition. The frame is rigged.

Alternative frames are emerging. Aging as accumulation: the gathering of experience, relationships, wisdom, and perspective that only time provides. Aging as continuation: the same person moving through a different chapter, not a different person altogether. Aging as its own thing: not failed youth, but a distinct phase of life with its own possibilities and constraints.

These frames do not deny loss. Bodies change. Capacities diminish. Death approaches. The alternative to the narrative of decline is not the narrative of denial. It is the narrative of complexity: that aging involves loss and gain, limitation and possibility, endings and continuities. The dominant story flattens this complexity into tragedy. A fuller story holds more.

Intergenerational solidarity is part of this shift. When younger people see older people as their future selves rather than a different category of human, the investment changes. The granfluencer phenomenon includes something striking: young audiences who find meaning in watching older people live fully. They are not merely entertained; they are rehearsing their own futures, finding evidence that those futures might be worth anticipating.

The Limits of Individual Resistance

#

Visibility does not fix policy.

Medicare coverage gaps remain. Nursing home quality varies widely. Age discrimination in hiring continues, amplified by algorithms that screen out older workers before human recruiters see their names. Social Security faces political uncertainty. These are structural problems that require structural solutions: legislation, regulation, funding, enforcement.

Advocacy organizations do this work. AARP, with thirty-eight million members, works on age discrimination, healthcare, and Social Security. Justice in Aging focuses on legal advocacy for low-income older adults. The Older Women’s League addresses women’s issues in aging. These organizations shift policy in ways that individual visibility cannot.

Where personal and political meet is in culture change. Visible older people can shift what seems possible, what seems normal, what seems worth wanting. Advocacy organizations can shift what becomes law. Both are necessary. Neither is sufficient alone.

At Your Kitchen Table

#

If you have felt invisible, this piece is not telling you to become an influencer. Most people will not. Most people should not have to perform for an audience to be seen.

What these visible older people represent is permission. Permission to refuse the script that says you should shrink, quiet down, step aside. Permission to continue being yourself, loudly or quietly, publicly or privately, in whatever form that takes for you. Permission to age in a way that is yours rather than the way the dominant narrative prescribes.

The story of aging is not fixed. It is written and rewritten by the people who refuse the script they were handed. Lillian Droniak does this with thirteen million witnesses. Most do it with far fewer: by continuing to work, create, love, learn, argue, laugh, and insist on their own relevance. The dominant narrative of decline is powerful. It is not true.

The people reclaiming visibility are not proving that aging is easy. They are proving that it is not disappearance. That the person you are at forty continues at seventy and ninety, changed by time but not erased by it. That visibility is not vanity but insistence: I am still here. I still matter. Look.